DISPARITAS PEMBERIAN KREDIT BANK KONVENSIONAL DAN PEMBIAYAAN BANK SYARIAH TERHADAP UMKM: ANALISIS YURIDIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37478/als.v15i01.5227Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the disparity between Sharia and Conventional Banks in conducting financing and credit to MSMEs. This kind of study uses statutory methods and normative legal theory. The findings of this study show that conventional banks and Islamic banks are different from one another. The first difference is seen in the fundamental ideas that each bank embraces. Conventional banks usually emphasize creditworthiness based on collateral or customer-owned collateral and use fixed or variable interest rate schemes. On the other hand, Islamic banks operate according to sharia law, which prohibits riba, or interest. The contract or agreement used by conventional and Islamic banks is the second difference. Islamic banks use musyarakah and mudharabah as forms of funding. However, conventional banks use leasing, factoring and credit contracts. The two banks' approach to risk management is the third difference. Islamic banks bear the risk, especially when funding items such as musyarakah and mudharabah. In Conventional banks, the customer bears all the business risk. Conventional banks charge late fees in the form of cumulative interest. The fourth difference relates to the way funds are raised and allocated. The objectives and funding strategies used by Islamic banks and conventional banks are very different. Since funds are allocated exclusively to activities that comply with Shariah regulations and halal values, the objects of financing in Islamic banks are often restricted. Islamic banks usually adopt a more individualized and partnership-focused approach to their customers. On the other hand, conventional banks do not have any restrictions on the object of funding, hence funds can be used for both halal and non-halal activities.
Downloads
Keywords:
MSMEs, Conventional Bank Credit, Islamic Bank Financing, Customer Satisfaction, Financing DisparityReferences
Annisa, & Amanda. (2017). Analisis Perbandingan Metode Pemberian Kredit Pada Bank Konvensional Dengan Pembiayaan Murabahah Pada Bank Syariah. Jurnal Akuntansi, 1(1), 49–58.
Berlian, D., Andri, A., & Apriana, A. (2023). Perbandingan Pemberian Kredit Antara Bank Konvensional Dan Pembiayaan Bank Syariah Kepada Usaha Kecil Dan Menengah. Jurnal Perbankan Syariah Indonesia (JPSI), 2(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.57171/jpsi.v2i2.6
Chikmah, A. N. (2015). Analisis Perbandingan Sistem Pemberian Kredit Bank Konvensional Dengan Pembiayaan Bank Syariah Pada Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah. Jurnal Akuntansi Unesa, 2(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v5-i11/1921
Dariana. (2019). Analisis Perbandingan Perhitungan Sistem Bunga (Bank Konvensional) dan Bagi Hasil Tabungan (Bank Syariah). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 612–634.
Dwi Ceysa, S., Demar Putri, J., Putri, D. A., & Siswajanthy, F. (2024). Peranan Perbankan dalam Perekonomian Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusi, 8(2), 25959–25964.
Firmansyah, H., Sobana, dadang H., & Islam, A. M. S. (2024). Perbankan dan Industri Keuangan Nonbank (IKNB) Syariah (A. Ulinuha & S. Khoiriyah (eds.)). PT Bumi Aksara.
Huang, J., Kombate, B., Li, Y., Kouadio, K. R., & Xie, P. (2023). Effective risk management in the shadow of COVID-19 pandemic: The evidence of Indonesian listed corporations. Heliyon, 9(5), e15744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15744
Kurnia, R. A. E. (2020). Menelaah Elemen Etika Bisnis dalam Manajemen Resiko Bank Syariah. Iqtishaduna, 11(2), 18–38. https://doi.org/10.20414/iqtishaduna.v11i2.2444
Mansour, W., Ajmi, H., & Saci, K. (2022). Regulatory policies in the global Islamic banking sector in the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Banking Regulation, 23(3), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00147-3
Meningkatkan, D., & Organisasi, K. (2018). Urgensi Penerapan Ta’zir Pada Perbankan Syariah. Proceeding of Dirundeng International Conference on Islamic Studies (DICIS 2021), 7(2), 67–90.
Miftahuddin, M. (2019). Perbandingan Konsep Keuangan pada Bank Syariah dan Bank Konvensional. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 2(2), 213–228. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v2i2.86
Muhammad Nasrullah, R. I. et. al. (2017). Manajemen Risiko Perbankan Syari ’ ah. La Riba, III(December 2009), 151–165. https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEI/article/view/2560/2348
Nikmah, M., & Siswahyudianto, S. (2022). Strategi Diferensiasi untuk Menciptakan Keunggulan Kompetitif pada UMKM Catering Pawon Gusti Desa Surondakan Kecamatan Trenggalek Kabupaten Trenggalek. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Madani, 4(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.51353/jmbm.v4i1.627
Pato, S., Pemberian, A., Mikro…, K., Ekonomi, F., Bisnis, D., Manajemen, J., Sam, U., & Manado, R. (2013). Analisis Pemberian Kredit Mikro Pada Bank Syariah Mandiri Cabang Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 8751(4), 875–885.
PJOK No 18/POJK.03/2016, Pub. L. No. 18, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan 1 (2016). http://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/regulasi/lembaga-keuangan-mikro/peraturan-ojk/Documents/SAL-POJK PERIZINAN FINAL F.pdf
Rahmanti, V. N. (2019). Mengapa Perbankan Syariah Masih Disamakan Dengan Perbankan Konvensional? IMANENSI: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi Islam, 1(1), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.34202/imanensi.1.1.2013.62-74
Sari, N. Y., Nababan, N. W. S., Halawa, C. G., & Manurung, R. (2024). Analisis Perbedaan Sistem Bnak Syariah dan Bank Konvensional. DE_JOURNAL (Dharmas Education Journal), 5(1), 563–573. https://ejournal.undhari.ac.id/index.php/de_journal/article/view/1161
Suretno, S., & Bustam, B. (2020). Peran Bank Syariah Dalam Meningkatkan Perekonomian Nasional Melalui Pembiayaan Modal Kerja Pada Umkm. Ad-Deenar: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 4(01), 1. https://doi.org/10.30868/ad.v4i01.752
Undang-Undang No. 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perbankan (1998). file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/UU Nomor 10 Tahun 1998.pdf
Wibowo, W. S. W., Yunanto, Y., & Hafidh Prasetyo, M. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pemberian Kredit Kepada Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah (Umkm) Oleh Bank Umum. Notarius, 13(2), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31096
Wiroso. (2005). Perhimpunan Dana dan Distribusi Hasil Usaha Bank Syariah. Grasindo.
Ramadhan, M. R., Sagita, N., & Hendra, J. (2024). Perbandingan risiko pembiayaan pada bank syariah dan bank konvensional di indonesia. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 9(5), 3476–3485.
Redaksi, B. (2024). Perbedaan Pembiayaan Syariah dan Konvensional, Pilih Mana? TAF Make It Yours. Perbedaan Pembiayaan Syariah dan Konvensional, Pilih Mana?
Sari, I. M., Siregar, S., & Harahap, I. (2020). Manajemen Risiko Kredit bagi Bank Umum. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS) 2020, 1(1), 553–557. https://prosiding.seminar-id.com/index.php/sainteks/article/view/497
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
An author who publishes in ANALISIS agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
