ANALISIS PROFIL KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA SMA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN HUKUM NEWTON MELALUI PENDEKATAN MIXED METHODS

Adilah  Hanifah; Oka Saputra; Imam Sucahyo; Hanandita Veda  Saphira

doi:10.37478/optika.v10i1.7895

Authors

Adilah Hanifah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Oka Saputra Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Imam Sucahyo Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Hanandita Veda Saphira University of Wollongong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/optika.v10i1.7895

Abstract

Dengan menerapkan pembelajaran berbasis digital diharapkan mampu meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa di Indonesia, seperti melalui media belajar interaktif menggunakan website dan simulator sederhana. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengidentifikasi profil kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa dengan memanfaatkan penilaian formatif dalam proses pembelajaran fisika di tingkat SMA. Metode penelitian termasuk dalam penelitian pendahuluan dengan sampel 63 siswa SMA di Surabaya, Jawa Timur. Teknik pengumpulan data meliputi pembagian tes keterampilan beprikir kritis, survei tanggapan siswa, dan wawancara dengan guru fisika. Penelitian ini memberikan hasil yang signifikan pada rendahnya keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa dengan 32 siswa dalam kategori sangat rendah, indikator terendah adalah inferensi dan tertinggi adalah evalusi. Sedangkan proses pembelajaran yang masih menggunakan metode pembelajaran konvensional dapat memengaruhi rendahnya kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa, penting untuk memanfaatkan teknologi, terutama pada media pembelajaran fisika.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Kemampuan berpikir kritis, Asesmen, Pembelajaran Digital

References

Ahmed, S. K. (2024). How to choose a sampling technique and determine sample size for research: A simplified guide for researchers. In Oral Oncology Reports (Vol. 12). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oor.2024.100662

Amani, J., & Mkimbili, S. T. (2025). Developing critical thinking skills among secondary schools students: The role of research project. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101883

Amumpuni, R. S., Hartono, R., Rukmini, D., & Haryanti, R. P. (2025). The impact of collaborative strategic reading on EFL students with different critical thinking levels. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101904

Bayley, S. H. (2022). Learning for adaptation and 21st-century skills: Evidence of pupils’ flexibility in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642

Chen, D., & Agus Kurniawan, D. (2022). B U A N A P E N D I D I K A N Preliminary studies: Analysis Of Student Needs For The Use Of Multiple Integral E-Module Of Mathematics Physics I Course Articles Information Abstrak. In Buana Pendidikan (Vol. 18, Number 1). http://jurnal.unipasby.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_buana_pendidikan/index

Chu, H., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Tian, M., Yang, Z., Zeng, L., Li, N., Wu, Y., Zhao, Y., Chi, C., Chen, Y., & Zhan, S. (2023). Mixed Methods Research in General Practice: Key Points of Design and Implementation and Case Analysis. Chinese General Practice, 26(1), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0596

Facione, P. A. (2015). Permission to Reprint for Non-Commercial Uses Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Peter A. Facione, Measured Reasons LLC. www.insightassessment.com

Fan, M., Liu, X., Song, X., & Xie, J. (2025). The effects of group size on critical thinking and writing development in collaborative writing: A mixed methods study. System, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103738

Hardianti, H., Liliawati, W., & Tayubi, Y. R. (2023). Karakteristik tes kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA pada materi momentum dan impuls: Perbandingan classical theory test (CTT) dan model Rasch. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 8(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v8i1.30958

Herlinawati, H., Marwa, M., Ismail, N., Junaidi, Liza, L. O., & Situmorang, D. D. B. (2024). The integration of 21st century skills in the curriculum of education. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35148

Hikmah, F. N., Sukarelawan, Moh. I., Nurjannah, T., & Djumati, J. (2021). Elaboration of High School Student’s Metacognition Awareness on Heat and Temperature Material: Wright Map in Rasch Model. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i2.9488

Hodgkiss, A., Thomas, M. S. C., Tolmie, A. K., & Farran, E. K. (2025). Associations between spatial skills and physics knowledge in primary school: Spatial skills are more important for conceptual scientific knowledge than for factual scientific knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106135

Karaer, G., Hand, B., & French, B. F. (2024). Examining the impact of science writing heuristic (SWH) approach on development of critical thinking, science and language skills of students with and without disabilities. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101443

Lee, P. J., Hung, J. F., Liau, P. H., & Tsai, C. Y. (2026). A dual mediation model linking design thinking mindset to creative problem-solving skills through creative self-efficacy and critical thinking disposition. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102055

Lim, E. W. C. (2021). Technology enhanced learning of quantitative critical thinking. Education for Chemical Engineers, 36, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.04.001

Mafarja, N., & Zulnaidi, H. (2022). Relationship between Critical thinking and academic self- concept: An experimental study of Reciprocal teaching strategy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101113

Mao, Y., Chen, C., Deng, Y., & Cao, Z. (2026). Critical reading in design education: Effects of layout on experts’ and novices’ visual attention and reading performance. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102011

Muhamad Dah, N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Syed Abdul Azziz, S. S. (2024). The impacts of open inquiry on students’ learning in science: A systematic literature review. In Educational Research Review (Vol. 43). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100601

Noperi, H., Irwandani, Wiliyanti, V., Yanti, F. A., Syamsuri, M. M. F., & Yusandika, A. D. (2024). Validasi Instrumen Literasi Sains dengan Model Rasch untuk Socio-Scientific Issues. Natural: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA, 11(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.30738/natural.v11i2.18891

Park, J. H., Li, Y., & Niu, W. (2023). Revisiting creativity and critical thinking through content analysis. Journal of Creativity, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100056

PISA 2022 Results (Volume I). (2023). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., AlGerafi, M. A. M., & Javed, S. (2024). Project-based learning as a catalyst for 21st-Century skills and student engagement in the math classroom. Heliyon, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39988

Rizkita, N. I., & Mufit, F. (2022). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep dan Sikap Siswa Terhadap Belajar Fisika Pada Materi Hukum Newton Tentang Gerak. JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP), 6(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol6-iss2/599

Roshid, M. M., & Haider, M. Z. (2024). Teaching 21st-century skills in rural secondary schools: From theory to practice. Heliyon, 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30769

Singh, U., Tewari, V., & Das, S. (2025). Digital workforce competencies: A multidimensional scale for the 21st century. Acta Psychologica, 261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105883

Sucipta, I. W., Candiasa, I. M., & Sudirtha, I. G. (n.d.). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Dan Bentuk Asesmen Formatif Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis (Vol. 13, Number 2).

Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2025). An assessment of creativity style inventory: A Rasch model. Journal of Creativity, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100110

Terblanche, A., van Rooyen, A. A., & Enwereji, P. C. (2025). When teachers become learners: Challenges with the integration of critical thinking into accounting curricula. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101878

Trianah, Y. (2020). Penerbit?: LP4MK STKIP PGRI Lubuklinggau Pengembangan Instrumen Literasi Sains Materi Larutan Elektrolit Dan Non Elektrolit Untuk Siswa SMK Kelas X. Jurnal Prespektif Pendidikan, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.31540/jpp.v14i2.1353

Wirzén, M. (2025). ‘If they say “there’s a photo ban and any clothes you can forget about taking them”’: Interactional functions of hypothetical direct reported speech in adoption assessment interviews. Journal of Pragmatics, 247, 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.08.003