INSTRUMEN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DI SEKOLAH DASAR

Astuti Astuti; Yonarlianto  Tembang; St Budi Waluya; M Asikin

doi:10.37478/jpm.v4i1.2307

Authors

Astuti Astuti Universitas Musamus, Merauke, Indonesia
Yonarlianto Tembang Universitas Musamus, Merauke, Indonesia
St Budi Waluya Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
M Asikin Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v4i1.2307

Abstract

The research aims to measure the feasibility and reliability of the mathematics learning style instrument. The initial stage is the preparation of the instrument, followed by logical validity testing and trials. Instrument trials were carried out in class IIIB of an elementary school in Ungaran, Central Java with 36 respondents. The validity test was continued using the Pearson product moment formula using the Office Excel program with valid criteria if r_xy>r_table at a significant level of 5%. Based on the validity test, out of 30 instruments, 21 were valid. Reliability test using Alpha Cronbach formula calculation using Office Excel. The results of the reliability test were r₁₁=0,6497, r_table=0,3202, it was concluded that the instrument had a fairly good level of reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Mathematic, Learning style, Instrument

References

Alwi, I. (2012). Kriteria Empirik Dalam Menentukan Ukuran Sampel. Jurnal Formatif, 2(2), 140–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v2i2.95

Ardyani, W., Nugroho, A. A., & Shodiqin, A. (2020). Instrumen angket gaya belajar visual, auditorial dan kinestetik untuk siswa SMP: validitas dan reliabilitas. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (5th Senatik), 5(2009), 250–256. http://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/senatik/article/view/953

Astuti. (2021). Pembelajaran Matematika Kelas Tinggi Di Sekolah Dasar Dengan Daring Saat Covid-19. Prosiding Sendika, 254–261. http://eproceedings.umpwr.ac.id/index.php/sendika/article/view/1527

Astuti, A., Waluya, S. B., & Asikin, M. B. (2020a). Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika untuk Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Musamus Journal of Primary Education, 3(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.35724/musjpe.v3i1.3117

Astuti, Waluya, S. B., & Asikin, M. (2020b). THE IMPORTANT OF CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS FOR 4.0 ERA. International Journal on Education, Management and IInovation (IJEMI), 1(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12928/ijemi.v1i1.1512

Bire, A. L., Geradus, U., & Bire, J. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, Dan Kinestetik Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 2(2), 291–296. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v2i2.486

Chislett, V., & Chapman, A. (2005). Learning style - VAK test. 1–5. https://www.girlguides.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/2_1-VAK-learning-styles-questionnaire-selftest.pdf

Hardiana, M. T. A. N., & Suyata, P. (2015). The Effectiveness of VAK (Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic) Model in Learning of Summary Writing. International Journal of Research and Review, 2(6), 343–347. http://www.gkpublication.in/IJRR_Vol.2_Issue6_June2015/IJRR0066.pdf

Hayati, S., & Lailatussaadah, L. (2016). Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Pengetahuan Pembelajaran Aktif, Kreatif Dan Menyenangkan (Pakem) Menggunakan Model Rasch. Jurnal Ilmiah Didaktika, 16(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.22373/jid.v16i2.593

INDONESIA, T. B. P. B. (2008). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (5th ed.). PUSAT BAHASA DEPARTEMEN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL. https://pustaka.kemdikbud.go.id/libdikbud/index.php?p=show_detail&id=38657

Khotimah, H., Supena, A., & Hidayat, N. (2019). Meningkatkan attensi belajar siswa kelas awal melalui media visual. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 8(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpa.v8i1.22657

Knill, O. (2014). Mathematics in The Primary Curriculum. In Http://Www.Math.Havard.Edu (pp. 12–23). https://people.math.harvard.edu/~knill/pedagogy/professionalnorms/talk.pdf

Lestari, K. E., & Yudhanegara, M. R. (2015). Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika. PT Refika Aditama. https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=22387

Marpaung, J. (2016). Pengaruh Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. KOPASTA: Jurnal Program Studi Bimbingan Konseling, 2(2), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.33373/kop.v2i2.302

Maryani, I., Fatmawati, L., Erviana, Yuli, V., Kartika, D., Wangid, M. N., & Mustadi, A. (2017). Validity and reability of learning style scale of the elementary school students. Yogyakarta Uuniversity, 364–382. https://usd.ac.id/seminar/icre/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/364-382_Maryani_ICRE2017.pdf

Nizaruddin, Waluya, S. B., Rochmad, & Isnarto. (2020). Validitas dan reliabilitas angket gaya belajar VAK. Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika (5th Senatik) Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Fpmipati-Universitas Pgri Semarang, 2, 435–441, 2, 435–441. http://conference.upgris.ac.id/index.php/senatik/article/view/1038

Putri, F. E., Amelia, F., & Gusmania, Y. (2019). Hubungan Antara Gaya Belajar dan Keaktifan Belajar Matematika Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Edumatika: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 83. https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v2i2.406

Riyani, R., Maizora, S., & Hanifah, H. (2017). Uji Validitas Pengembangan Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemahaman Relasional Pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas Viii Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 1(1), 60–65. https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.1.1.60-65

Sari, A. K. (2014). Analisis Karakteristik Gaya Belajar Vak(Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik)Mahasiswa Pendidikan Informatika Angkatan 2014. Edutic - Scientific Journal of Informatics Education, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21107/edutic.v1i1.395

Selaras, G. H., Ahda, Y., Alberida, H., & Wahyuni, T. P. (2019). The Validity and Reliability of The Instrument Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skill on The Biological Scope Materials. Bioeducation Journal, 3(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.24036/bioedu.v3i2.242

Sukendra, I. K., & Atmaja, I. K. S. (2020). Instrumen Penelitian. In Journal Academia. http://repo.mahadewa.ac.id/id/eprint/1742

Syamsudin, A. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Non Tes (Informal) untuk Menjaring Data Kualitatif Perkembangan Anak Usia Dni. Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, iii(1), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpa.v3i1.2882

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Wahyuni, Y. (2017). Identifikasi gaya belajar (Visual, Auditorial, Kinestetik). Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2), 128–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2037

Yusup, F. (2017). Uji Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jorpres (Jurnal Olahraga Prestasi), 13(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.21831/jorpres.v13i1.12884

Zaenal Arifin. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam Suatu Penelitian. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Mathematics), 2(1), 28–36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228883541.pdf