PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI SAINS SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21

Authors

  • Laifa Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Jumadi Jumadi Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Jaslin Ikhsan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v2i2.933

Abstract

Research has been carried out on the development of instruments for science communication skills as part of 21st Century skills at the higher education level. The instrument was developed from indicators of communication skills, namely understanding the key ideas of other people's utterances and presenting or reading data in the form of tables or graphs. The development carried out with the Borg and Gall model produces valid and reliable instruments. The test subjects were 94 students who were selected by cluster sampling. The tests carried out included construct validation tests, empirical validation tests, and testing the use of instruments to measure science communication skills. The results of construct validation show that the instrument is considered very good and suitable for use. The results of empirical validation show that the instrument is valid and reliable so that it can be used. The trial results show that the instrument for the assessment of the results of this development can be used to measure science communication skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Assessment instruments, Communication Science, 21st Century Skills

References

Alagoz, E. (2013). Social argumentation in online synchronous communication. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 399-426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9183-2

Australia Curriculum Council. (1998). The Curriculum Framework for Kindergarten to Year 12 Education in Western Australia. Western Australia: Curriculum Council.

Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6-E10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/

Aclufi, A. (2005). Doing science: the process of scientific inquiry. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Carter, D. F., Ro, H. K., Alcott, B., & Lattuca, L. R. (2016). Co-curricular connections: The role of undergraduate research experiences in promoting engineering students’ communication, teamwork, and leadership skills. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 363-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-015-9386-7

Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S. W., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2016). ENHANCING STUDENTS’COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM THROUGH SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUES. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9557-6

Edwards, J. L., & Gordon, S. M. (2006). You should—I should: Mentoring responsibilities as perceived by faculty, alumni, and students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Gall, Meredith, D., Gall, Joyce, P. and Borg, Walter R. (2007). Educational Research: An Introduction 8th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education

Gray, F. E. (2010). Specific oral communication skills desired in new accountancy graduates. Business communication quarterly, 73(1), 40-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1080569909356350.

Harasym, P. H., Woloschuk, W., & Cunning, L. (2007). Undesired variance due to examiner stringency/leniency effect in communication skill scores assessed in OSCEs. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 13(5), 617-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-007-9068-0

Kemdikbud. (2013a). Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 65, Tahun 2013, tentang Standar Proses.Google Scholar

Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Kuchel, L. (2017). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(2), 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1113573

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2001). Science curriculum standard. Beijing: MOE.

National Research Council [NRC]. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education. Washington, DC: The National Academy.

Perpres Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.

Permenristekdikti Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.

Subali, B. (2013). Kemampuan berpikir pola divergen dan berpikir kreatif dalam keterampilan proses sains. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Tsabari, A.B. & Lewenstein, B. V. (2013). An Instrument for Assessing Scientists’ Written Skills in Public Communication of Science. Science Communication, 35(1), 56-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012440634

Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 tentang Pendidikan Tinggi.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-19

How to Cite

Rahmawati, L., Jumadi, J., & Ikhsan, J. (2021). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI SAINS SEBAGAI BAGIAN DARI KETERAMPILAN ABAD 21. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2(2), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v2i2.933