Analisis Wilayah Kecamatan Potensial Melalui Pendekatan Tipologi Klassen di Kabupaten Ende

Authors

  • Estherlina Sagajoka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/als.v10i1.322

Abstract

This study aims to determine the comparison of the results of the inequality analysis of economic development between districts / cities in the province of East Nusa Tenggara for the period of 2013-2018. The method used in this research is quantitative descriptive analysis using the Williamson index, and Theil Entropy Index, using time data per capita PDRB series and population data for each district / city in 2013-2018.

The Williamson Index analysis results show that the economic development sector inequality in 21 districts in NTT province is very evenly distributed (low inequality) except for the city of Kupang, which has an Williamson Index value of 1.49 other than districts in NTT province in the period 2013-2018. The Intra Index Analysis Results show spatial inequality within the regency. The city of Nusa Tenggara Timur province is fairly evenly distributed within the regency except the city of Kupang  shows an unequal inequality compared to 21 other districts. Through the Theil Entropy Index calculation of development inequality between 21 regencies and Kupang  tend to widen (divergence) which has Theil  Index of 798,15, while the other 21 districts in the 2013-2018 period have the Theil Entropy Index Index 211,26 for Regencies and  TTS 201,11, while other districts have an index numberbelow 200.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

Comparative Study, Inequality, Wiliamson Index, Theil Entropy Index

References

Barker, T., Ekins, P., & Foxon, T. (2007). The macro-economic rebound effect and the UK economy. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.009

Daryanto, A. (2003). Disparitas Pembangunan Perkotaan-Perdesaan di Indonesia. Agrimedia.

Dhyatmika, K. W. (2013). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan Provinsi Banten Pasca Pemekaran. Http://Eprints.Undip.Ac.Id/38984/.

Ekonomi, K., Berkembang, N., & Brata, A. G. (2002). Jurnal EKONOMI PEMBANGUNAN PEMBANGUNAN MANUSIA DAN KINERJA EKONOMI REGIONAL DI INDONESIA. JEP.

Franita, R. (2016). Analisa Pengangguran Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial.

Krinantya, N. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Ketimpangan Antar Wilayah Di Provinsi Jawa Timur Dan D.I.Yogyakarta. Http://Eprints.Undip.Ac.Id/43107/.

Kumala, M., Soelistyo, A., & Nuraini, I. (2017). Analisis potensi sektor pariwisata sebagai sektor unggulan di wilayah jawa timur. Ilmu Ekonomi.

Mankiw. (2013). Mankiw Principles of Economics. In Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Mopangga, H. (2011). Analisis Ketimpangan Pembangunan dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Provinsi Gorontalo. Trikonomika.

Muhammad, D. S. H. (2018). MODEL PERHITUNGAN PENDAPATAN NASIONAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF EKONOMI ISLAM. Jurnal CMES. https://doi.org/10.20961/cmes.11.2.26996

Noor, D. J. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian: Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, & Karya Ilmiah. In Metodologi Penelitian: Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi, & Karya Ilmiah.

Nuraini, I. (2017). Kualitas Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah Kabupaten / Kota Di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan.

Pangkiro, H. A. K., Rotinsulu, D. C., Patrick, D., Jurusan, W., Pembangunan, E., Ekonomi, F., & Bisnis, D. (2016). Analisis Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Kemiskinan Terhadap Tingkat Ketimpangan Di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara Analysis of Growth Economic and Poverty on the Level of Inequality in North Sulawesi. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi.

Pelling, M., Özerdem, A., & Barakat, S. (2002). The macro-economic impact of disasters. Progress in Development Studies. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993402ps042ra

Syahrum., S. (2014). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. KOMUNIKASI PENELITIAN KUANTITATIF Program Studi Jurnalistik & Humas.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-01

How to Cite

Sagajoka, E. . (2020). Analisis Wilayah Kecamatan Potensial Melalui Pendekatan Tipologi Klassen di Kabupaten Ende. ANALISIS, 10(1), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.37478/als.v10i1.322