ASSESSING THE STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH RECOMBINATION AND APPROXIMATION STRATEGY

Authors

  • Simon P K Ngatu University of Flores Ende Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/lantern.v11i2.7260

Abstract

The paper considers to assess whether recommendation and approximation are suited to beginners as well as intermediate and advance students in writing. The growing academic interest towards writing comprehension in language teaching leads every language teachers to find appropriate strategies to assess the students’ writing ability. Recombination and approximation are apparently known as two important strategies to assess the students’ ability in writing. The assessment itself covers content, grammatical accuracy, organization, and vocabulary along with its coherence and cohesion. The assessment of this study was based on discourse approach. The data collected from a private English course in Yogyakarta. Six students were randomly selected for the study, with two from each level participating. This study employed a combination of methods, including a writing test and a semi-structured interview. The results of the writing test were then subjected to a thorough analysis, employing analytical scoring rubrics as a methodological framework. The findings indicate that recombination is an appropriate learning strategy for novice students, while approximation is more suitable for intermediate and advanced students.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

descriptive text, discourse approach, recombination, approximation

References

Alkhatib, N. I. M. (2015). Written Corrective Feedback at a Saudi university: English Language Teachers’ Beliefs, Students’ Preferences, and teachers’ Practices, Dissertation, Unpublished, University of Essex.

Fajriyani, T. N. (2011) Improving Students’ Writingability through Clustering Technique: A Classroom Action Research in the Second Year of SMP Al-Hasra Bojongsari-Depok. Thesis, Unpublished, Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University, Jakarta.

Canale, M. (1983): From communicative Competence to Communicative Language Pedagogy. In Richards, J.C., & Schmidt, R. (ed.): Language and Communication. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980): “Theoretical Bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing”. Applied Linguistics, 1, 1-47.

Celce - Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E (2001). Discourse and context in Language Teaching: A guide for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.

Flowerdew, J. (2013). Discourse in English Language Education. New York: Routledge.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Ruqaiya Hasan. (1976). Cohesion in English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Hong Hai, N. T. (2004). The Importance of Discourse Analysis in Teaching Oral English. Teacher’s edition, 36-40

Kirvalidze, N. (2007). Modern Trends in Language Teaching: Discourse Approach to Text Interpretation. Proceeding Modern TI.

McCarthy, M (1991). Discourse Analysos for Language Teachers. United Kingdom: Cambridge University press

Oshima, A. & Hogue, A. 1997. Introduction to Academic Writing (2nd Edition). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Paltridge, B. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse Analysis. Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J., & Platt, H. (1993). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. New York: Longman.

Sáez, F. T., & Martin, J. L. (2005). Discourse Competence Dealing with Text in the EFL Classroom.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Ngatu, S. P. K. (2025). ASSESSING THE STUDENTS’ COMPREHENSION ON DESCRIPTIVE TEXT THROUGH RECOMBINATION AND APPROXIMATION STRATEGY. Lantern: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.37478/lantern.v11i2.7260