IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CAMPUS TEACHING PROGRAM IN IMPROVING LITERACY AND NUMERACY COMPETENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37478/mahajana.v6i2.5852Abstract
SD Inpres Ende 13 is an elementary school located in the Ende district that is the target of the implementation of the 2024 batch 8 teaching campus program, which is included in the low level of the minimum competency assessment (AKM) results. This assessment will look at and measure the indicator aspects of students' numeracy and literacy abilities. Reading becomes the ability that is assessed from the literacy aspect. Meanwhile, the ability to analyse numbers is the focus of the assessment of numeracy abilities. This community service applies a qualitative method where campus teaching participants, students and teachers will carry out a planned work program to see comprehensive interactions. The increase in students' knowledge and literacy and numeracy skills can be seen from the measurement results due to this community service, where there was an increase from 65% to 88% reaching the good category in literacy, while the results of the numeracy AKM post-test showed a significant increase, namely from 31% to 72%. Positive results were obtained from the qualitative approach process of this service. The implementation of writing competitions, poetry reading, fast and correct counting competitions, creating reading communities and educational games has a positive impact on student learning outcomes.
Downloads
Keywords:
literacy, numeracy, campus teaching programReferences
Almazroui, K. M. (2023). Project-based learning for 21st-century skills: An overview and case study of moral education in the UAE. The Social Studies, 114(3), 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2022.2134281
Andriani, D. N., Wibawa, R. P., Firtriawati, D., Winanda, I., & Saputri, M. A. (2025). Project-Based Learning Based on Mastery Learning to Improve Continuous Numeracy Literacy in High School Students: Literature Review. EDUKASIA Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 595-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v6i1.1462
Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870
Cahya, O. D., & Meliyani, S. (2025). 21st Century Skills and Character Education: Building Indonesia's Future-Ready Generation. Cerdas Pedia: Journal of Smart Pedagogy and Education, 1(1), 1-11. https://jurnal.cerdaspedia.com/index.php/spedu/article/view/19
Fauiz, F. M., Min, L. H., & San, P. H. (2024). BRIDGING EDUCATIONAL GAPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF TRANSDISCIPLINARY, LITERACY, NUMERACY AND ACTIVE LEARNING METHODS. Journal of Contemporary Social Science and Education Studies (JOCSSES) E-ISSN-2785-8774, 4(3), 190-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14064668
Gal, I., Grotlüschen, A., Tout, D., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Numeracy, adult education, and vulnerable adults: a critical view of a neglected field. Zdm, 52(3), 377-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01155-9
Godsk, M., & Moller, K. L. (2025). Engaging students in higher education with educational technology. Education and Information Technologies, 30(3), 2941-2976. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-024-12901-x
Hidayat, N., Andriani, F., & Yoenanto, N. H. (2024). Exploring Challenges and Strategies for Improving the Quality of Education: Integrative Literature Review. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 7(1), 128-141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v7i1.73824
Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. (2024). Transforming education in Indonesia: The impact and challenges of the Merdeka belajar curriculum. Path of Science, 10(6), 5026-5039. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31
Kholid, M. N., et al. (2023). A systematic literature review of Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) in mathematics education: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Cogent education, 10(2), 2269047. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2269047
Libertus, M. E. (2025). The Importance of Early Mathematical Foundations, Sensemaking, and the Home Environment for Children’s Development of Arithmetic Fluency: Commentary on McNeil et al.(2025). Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 26(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/15291006251326581
Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619
Moon, R. C., & Kwan, S. H. (2022). Improving students’ intensive reading ability by using survey-question-read-review-recite-reflect method. JELITA, 3(1), 12-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56185/jelita.v3i1.95
Munthahana, J., Budiarto, M. T., & Wintarti, A. (2023). The application of ethnomathematics in numeracy literacy perspective: A literature review. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 177-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v6i2.17546
Nash, R., Patterson, K., Flittner, A., Elmer, S., & Osborne, R. (2021). School?based health literacy programs for children (2?16 Years): An international review. Journal of School Health, 91(8), 632-649. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13054
Nufus, R. H., Octoviani, R., Eliyana, S., & Sari, I. J. (2023). The implementation of the teaching campus program on students' 21st century skills: A systematic review. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 3(2), 278-294. http://journal.gmpionline.com/index.php/jpig/article/view/208
Pregoner, J. D. (2024). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. IMCC Journal of Science, 4(2), 31-36. https://hal.science/hal-04655066/
Prihartini, A. A., Ali, N. B., & Fitri, H. A. (2023). The role of school literacy movement (SLM) in increasing student interest in reading: a literature review. Jurnal Tatsqif, 21(1), 15-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v21i1.7409
Rahmadhani, S., & Suryati, L. (2022). Vocational high school students' competency needs to the world of work. Mimbar Ilmu, 27(2), 349-355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v27i1.42161
Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2023). Numeracy, gist, literal thinking and the value of nothing in decision making. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(7), 421-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00188-7
Roesslein, R. I., & Codding, R. S. (2019). Fraction interventions for struggling elementary math learners: A review of the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 56(3), 413-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22196
Saputra, I. P. W., Arti, L. P., Agustina, P., Tarigan, M., Edi, K., & Sukrawan, I. (2023). Viewing the Campus Teaching Program as a Praxis Step Merdeka Curriculum: Study of Opportunities and Challenges. In ICLSSE 2023: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Law, Social Sciences and Education, ICLSSE 2023, 1st June 2023, Singaraja, Bali, Indonesia (p. 279).
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and cognitive achievement: Implications for students with learning problems. Journal of learning disabilities, 22(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200103
Solihin, R. R., Susanto, T. T. D., Fauziyah, E. P., Yanti, N. V. I., & Ramadhania, A. P. (2024). The Efforts of Indonesian Government In Increasing Teacher Quality Based On PISA Result In 2022: A Literature Review. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 38(1), 57-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.381.6
Syahruddin, & Tambaip, B. (2023). Implementation of the Independent Campus Learning Policy ”MBKM”: An Overview from the Perspectives of Students and Lecturers. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i3.61918
Tatham, C. (2025). A systematic literature review of Third Space theory in research with children (aged 4-12) in multicultural educational settings. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 33(3), 867-886. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2283798
Taufiq, M. A., Herza, H., Putri, R. E., Ariksa, J., & Amalia, R. (2024). Challenges and Opportunities in the Implementation of School Literacy Movement at Senior High Schools in Bangka Belitung. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5354-5367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1748
Vilaça, A. (2021). A pagan arithmetic: unstable sets in indigenous Amazonia. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46(3), 304-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1834723
Zuilkowski, S., Sowa, P., & Ralaingita, W. (2023). Initial teacher training to promote sustainable education system improvement: A review of the evidence on pre-service teacher education for primary grade literacy and numeracy in low-and middle-income countries. Global Education Review, 10(3), 1-28. https://ger.mercy.edu/index.php/ger/article/view/629
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aloisius Harso, Maria Januari Azi Muku, Marianus Salvtore Wagho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors and other parties are bound to the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED) for the published articles. This permits users to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
