EKSPLORASI TEORETIS DAN PRAKTIS ASESMEN PEMBELAJARAN MENDALAM: WORKSHOP DI SMKS KESEHATAN BALI MEDIKA DENPASAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37478/mahajana.v6i3.5959Abstract
Recently, the policy of deep learning approaches has emerged as a key innovation in Indonesian education. In response, teachers must be adequately prepared, both theoretically and practically, to ensure meaningful implementation of this policy. This community engagement activity aimed to enhance the theoretical understanding and practical competence of teachers at SMKS Kesehatan Bali Medika Denpasar regarding assessment for deep learning. The activity was conducted through a workshop method, encompassing the delivery of theoretical concepts on deep learning assessment as well as the development of formative and summative assessment instruments. A total of 30 teachers participated in the workshop, guided by six facilitators from the Biology Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar. The outcomes of the activity were found to be effective. In terms of theoretical understanding, the participants’ presentations demonstrated a comprehensive grasp of assessment for deep learning, particularly in balancing formative and summative assessments and in promoting student involvement through learning feedback, self-assessment, and peer-assessment. In terms of practical competence, the teachers successfully developed problem-based assessment rubrics. A notable improvement was observed between the initial rubrics and those refined through collaborative discussion, particularly in the objectivity of the scoring categories, which shifted from potentially biased to more objective formulations. Despite these improvements in theoretical and practical aspects as targeted, continuous professional development remains essential to sustain and deepen teachers’ understanding amidst evolving educational policies. Furthermore, the development of summative assessment instruments must be expanded beyond problem-based rubrics to include observation checklists, project and product assessment rubrics, as well as portfolio evaluations.
Downloads
Keywords:
assessment, practical competence, theoretical understanding, deep learning , workshopReferences
Aldridge, J. M., & Bianchet, S. (2022). Using student feedback about the learning environment as a starting point for co-construction. Learning Environments Research, 25(3), 939–955. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09403-9
Amini, K., Salehzadeh, M., & Noktehsanj, R. (2024). Assessing the relationship between teaching quality and satisfaction with clinical teachers among medical students: a correlational cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 14(12), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088351
Bozkurt, F. (2020). Teacher Candidates’ Views On Self And Peer Assessment As A Tool For Student Development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2020v45n1.4
Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5
Cifrian, E., Andrés, A., Galán, B., & Viguri, J. R. (2020). Integration of different assessment approaches: application to a project-based learning engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31(2020), 62–75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.04.006
Hoang, A., Hepburn, S. J., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2025). The effect of self-reflection on the outcomes of online clinical skills training: a comparative study. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-025-10425-8
Kemendikdasmen. (2025). Naskah Akademik Pembelajaran Mendalam.
Lichtenberger, A., Hofer, S. I., Stern, E., & Vaterlaus, A. (2024). Enhanced conceptual understanding through formative assessment: results of a randomized controlled intervention study in physics classes. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 37, 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-024-09445-6
Maqsood, Z., & Yasmin, R. (2024). Effect of feedback on reflection , on deep learning of undergraduate medical students in a clinical setting. BMC Medical Education, 25(66), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06648-3
McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 85(85), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y
McClintock, A. H., Fainstad, T., Jauregui, J., & Yarris, L. M. (2021). Countering Bias in Assessment. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(5), 725–726. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-21-00722.1
Melser, M., Lettner, S., Bäwert, A., Puttinger, C., & Holzinger, A. (2020). Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments. BMC Medical Education, 20(479), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02383-z
Meza, A., Rodríguez, I., & Caviedes, L. (2021). Fostering EFL Preservice Teachers’ Academic Writing Skills Through Reflective Learning. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 23(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.15446/PROFILE.V23N1.85145
Ratnayake, A., Bansal, A., Wong, N., Saseetharan, T., Prompiengchai, S., Jenne, A., Thiagavel, J., Ashok, A., Ratnayake, A., Bansal, A., Wong, N., Saseetharan, T., Prompiengchai, S., Jenne, A., Thiagavel, J., & Ashok, A. (2023). All “wrapped” up in reflection: supporting metacognitive awareness to promote students’ self-regulated learning. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00103-23
Reynders, G., Lantz, J., Ruder, S. M., Stanford, C. L., & Cole, R. S. (2020). Rubrics to assess critical thinking and information processing in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00208-5
Sirianansopa, K. (2024). Evaluating students’ learning achievements using the formative assessment technique: a retrospective study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1373), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06347-5
Sottiyotin, T., Uitrakul, S., Sakdiset, P., Sukkarn, B., Sangfai, T., Chuaboon, L., & Palee, P. (2023). Effective formative assessment for pharmacy students in Thailand: lesson learns from a school of pharmacy in Thailand. BMC Medical Education, 23(300), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04232-1
Van, K., Tasawar, S., Brendel, E. B. K., Law, C., Mahajan, A., Brownell-Riddell, C., Diamond, N., Ritchie, K., & Monk, J. M. (2024). Using a ‘Students as Partners’ model to develop an authentic assessment promoting employability skills in undergraduate life science education. FEBS Open Bio, 15(2025), 506–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.13941
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 I Made Surya Hermawan, Ni Wayan Ekayanti, I Made Diarta, Komang Ayu Sri Candrika Kumara, Pande Putu Eka Saputra, Fitri Nursiam Budiasih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors and other parties are bound to the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED) for the published articles. This permits users to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
