ANALISIS SINERGITAS TARIK ULUR KEPENTINGAN DALAM PRODUKSI PERTANIAN DAN JASA LINGKUNGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37478/agr.v11i2.44Abstract
Synergi analysis of the tugging of interest in agricultural production and envirometal services. Conversion of land functions into intensive agriculture can cause degradation or declining land capability. This is because farmers' orientation is always on production and ignoring environmental services. Intensive agriculture always causes environmental problems, resulting in a tug of war in agricultural production and environmental services. The purpose of this study is to find out how much intensive land use has resulted in a deterioration of environmental services. This research was carried out on intensive agricultural land (Horticulture) (PI), AF-CK (cloves), AF-KK (cocoa), AF-KM (candlenut), AF-KP (coffee), owned by farmers and AF-HS (forest secondary) in Tn. Kelimutu National. This research uses interviews and exploration methods. The results showed that the level of intensification of horticultural land use in Kelimutu was classified as very intensive with an R-value and an LUI index = 79, the survey results showed that the density of earthworm populations in SPL-AF was as low as the population in SPL-HS, on average only 3 tails m-2, while in SPL-PI the average is only 0.24 m 2. The earthworm biomass in AF is about 69% smaller than the worms found in SPL-HS; earthworm biomass average in SPL-AF 15 g m-2 while in SPL-HS an average of 47 g m-2; and the smallest worm biomass found in SPL-PI averaging about 2.3 g m-2. The diversity of earthworms is significantly different between land uses. The average diversity of earthworms (H ') reaches 0.88; Index R = 0.34; and Index E = 0.92. The four species that dominate are 1). Pontoscolex (endogeik, INP = 48.52), 2). Megascolex (endogeik; INP 44,61), 3). Pheretima (epigeic, INP 35.29), and 4). Lumbricus (epigeic, INP = 13.01)
Downloads
Keywords:
Synergy, Agricultural Production, Environmental ServicesReferences
Alexander M. 1977. Introduction to Soil Microbiology, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York.
Alison G. Power. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture : tradeoffs and synergies. The Royal Society.Department of Ecology and EvolutionaryBiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. 2959 – 2971
Anderson J. M., and Ingram, J. S. I., (eds) (1993) Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility : A Handbook of Methods, 2nd edition, CAB International, Wallingford
Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Ende, 2014.
Bardgett, R. D.&van der Putten, W. H.Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Nature515, 505–511 (2014)
Bardgett R. D., Whittaker J. B, Frankland J. C. 1993c. The diet and food preferences of Onychiurus procampatus (Collembola) from upland grassland soils. Biology. Fertility. Soils 16, 296 - 298.
Barois I., Verdier B., Kaiser P., Mariotti A., Rangel P., and Lavelle P. 1987. Influence of the tropical earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Glossoscolecidae) on the fixation and mineralization of nitrogen. In: O.P. Pagliai and A.M. Bon vicini (Editors), On Earthworms. Mucchi Editore, Modena, Italy, pp. 151-158.Basker A., Kirkham J. H., and Macgregor A. N.1993. Changes in potassium availability and other soil properties due to soi ingestion by earthworms. Biology Fertility. Soils., 17: 154 - 158.
Beare M. H., Reddy M. V., Tian G., Srivastava S. C.1996 Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function in the tropics: the role of decomposer biota, Applied Soil Ecology
Bertrand M, Seabstian B, Blouin M. Joaan W, Oleveira T, Estrade J. R. 2014. Earthworm services for cropping systems. Official journal of the Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Blakemore R.J. 2002. Cosmopolitan Earthworms – an Eco – Taxonomic Guide to the Perogrine Species of the World, Canbera VermEcology.
Blouin M., Hodson,M. E. DelgadoE. A., Baker G., Brussaard L., Butt K. R., Dai J., Dendooven L., Peres G., Tondoh J. E., Cluzeau D., Brun J.-J. 2013. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services, European Journal of Soil Science
Bouche M. B. 1977. Strate  gies lombriciennesIn: Lohm, U., Persson, T., (Eds.), Soil Organisms as Components of Ecosystems. Ecological Bulletins, Stockholm, 25, pp. 122 - 132 .
Chaudhuri.P.S, Nath Sabyasachi. 2011. Community structure of earthworms under rubber plantations and mixed forests in Tripura, India, Journal of Environmental Biology. India. 2, 537-541
Clough Y, Barkmann J, Juhrbandt J, Kessler M, Wanger T C, Anshary A, Buchory D, Cicuzza D, Darras K, Putra D D, Erasmi S, Pitopang R, Schmidt C, Schulze CH, Seidel D, Steffan-Deventer I, Stenchly K, Vidal S, Weist M, Wielgoss A C and Tscharntke T, Cobining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests. PNAS (http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/ / pnas )
Couateaux M. M., Darbyshire J. F., 1997. Functional diversity amongst soil protozoa, Applied Soil Ecology, France
Curry J. P., 1994. Grassland Invertebrates Chapmann & Hall, London, 437.pp
Curry J.P., 1998. Factor Affecting Earthworm Abundance in Soil. In:Edwards, C.A. (Ed.) Earthworm ecology. CRC Press LLC. Washington D.C. Pp 37-64.
Darmawan A., Setyawati, R., Yanti H. 2014. Keanekaragaman Cacing Tanah (Kelas Oligochaeta) di Sekitar Tempat Pembuangan Akhir (TPA) Batu Layang Kecamatan Pontianak Utara.Protobiont. Pontianak. Vol 3 (2): 171 - 176
Deruiter P. C., Neutel A. M., Moore J. C.1997. Biodiversity in soil ecosystems : the role of energy flow and community stability, Applied Soil Ecology, Colorado 80639, USA
Dewi, W. S., Yanuwiyadi, B., Suprayogo, D. dan Hairiah, K. 2006. Alih Guna Hutan Menjadi Lahan Pertanian: (1) Dapatkah sistem agroforestri kopi mempertahankan diversitas cacing tanah di Sumberjaya?AGRIVITA VOL 28 NO 3.
Diana H. W., and Zachary A. S. 2011 Linking Soil Biodiversity And Vegetation : Implications For A Changing Planet, American Journal of Botany 98(3) : 517 – 527.
Dwiastuti S., Sajidan., Suwarno. 2015. Hubungan kepadatan cacing tanah dan kascing pada berbagai penggunaan lahan di gondang rejo, kabupaten karanganyar, jawa tengah. Universitas Seblas Maret, Surakarta
Edwards, C. A., and J. R. Lofty. 1977 Biology of Earthworms, Chapman and Hall 190 - 202.
FAO. 2009 Statistics from www.faostat.fao.org, updated April 2009. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Fragoso C., Brown G. G., Ptron J. C., Blanchart E., Lavelle P. Pashanasi B., Senapati B., Kumar T.,1997. Agricultural Intensification Soil Biodiversity and Agroecosystem Function In the Tropics; The role of earthworm Appiled Soil Ecology.6; 17-35
Giller K.E., Beare M. H., Lavelle P., Izac A. M. N., Swift, M.J. 1996. Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem Fungction, Applied Soil Ecology
Hairiah K., Suprayogo, D., Widianto, Berlian, Suhara, E., Mardiastuning, A., Widodo, R.H., Prayogo, C., Rahayu, S., 2004. Alih guna lahan hutan menjadi lahan pertanian: ketebalan seresah, populasi cacing tanah dan makroporositas tanah. Agrivita 26 (1), 68–80.
Hairiah K., Sulistyani, H., Suprayogo, D., Widianto, Purnomosidhi P., Widodo R.H., dan van Noordwijk, M. 2006. Litter layer residence time in forest and coffe agroforestry system in sumberjaya, West Lampung. Forest Ecology and Management 224 (2006) 45-57.
Hairiah K., Suprayogo D., Widianto, Berlian, Suhara E., MardiastuningA., Widodo R. H., Prayogo C., dan Rahayu S. 2001. Alih Guna Lahan Hutan Menjadi Lahan AgroforestriBerbasis Kopi: Ketebalan Seresah, Populasi Cacing Tanah dan Makroporositas Tanah, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang
Hairiah K., dan Ashari S. 2013. Pertanian Masa Depan. Agroforestry, Manfaat dan
Layanan Lingkungan, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang
Handayanto E.1994. Nitrogen Mineralization from Legume tree prunings of Different Quality. Thesis for Doctor of Phylosophy. Wye College, University ofLondon.
Harja D. dan Vincent G. 2008. SExI – FS Sapatially Explicit Individual – based Forest Simulator, World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF)
Inubushi K.,dan Watanabe I. 1986. Dynamics of available N in paddy soils. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 3: 561-578.Lavelle, P., 1978. Les Vers de Terre de la Savanne de Lamto (Crte d'Ivoire). Peuplements, Populations et Fonctions de l'F.cosystbme. Publications Laboratoire de Zoologke, E.N.S., Paris, No. 12, pp, 1-301
Keputusan Mentri Kehutanan Repoblik Indonesia 2001. Nomor 70 / Kpts – II Tentang Penetapan Kawasan Hutan, Perubahan Status dan Fungsi Kawasan Hutan. Jakarta.
Lavelle P., Melendez G., Pashanasi B., and Schaefer R. 1992a. Nitrogen mineralization and reorganization in casts of the geophagous tropical earthworm Pontoscolex corethurus (Glossoscolecidae). Biology. Fertility. Soils., 14: 49-53.
Lavelle, P., Blanchart E., Martin A., Spain A., and Martin S. 1992b. Impact of soil fauna on the properties of soils in the humid tropics. In: Lal R.,and Sfinchez P.A. (Editors), Myths and Science of Soils of the Tropics. Special Publication No. 29 SSSA, Wisconsin, pp. 157-185.
Lavelle P., Blanchart E., Martin A., Martin S., Spain A., Toutain F., Barois I., and Schaefer R. 1993. A hierarchical model for decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: application to soils of the humid tropics. Biotropica, 25: 130 – 150.
Lavelle, P.; Barros, E.; Blanchart, E.; Brown, G.; Desjardins, T.; Mariani, L. and Rossi, J-P. 2001. SOM Management in the Tropics: why Feeding the soil Macrofauna? Agroecosystems 61: 53-61
Lee, K. E. 1985. Earthworm Their Ecology and Relationships with Soil and Land Use. CSIRO Division of Soil Adelaide. Academic Press, Sydney.
Moore J., C, Walter D.E., Hunt H.W. 1988. Arthropod regulation of micro- and mesobiota in below-ground detrital food webs.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 33, 419±439.Paul, E,A. and Clark, F.E., 1989. Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
Munyanziza E., Kehri H. K., Bagyaraj D. J. 1996. Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agro-ecosystem function in the tropics : the role of mycorrhiza in crops and trees, Applied Soil Ecology
Patrick J. Bohlen and Clive A. Edwards. 1995. Earthworm Effects On n Dynamics and Soil Respiration In Microcosms Receiving Organic and Inorganic Nutrients Soil Biol. Biochem. Vol. 27. No. 3. pp.341-348, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 45210, U.S.A.
Prasanth Narayanan S. , Sathrumithra, Christopher S., Thomas G, A. P. dan Julka J. M. 2016. Current distribution of the invasive earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus (Müller, 1857) after a century of its first report from Kerala state, India Opusc. Zool. Budapest. 101–107
Purwanto, Handayanto E, Suprayogo D, dan Hairiah, K. 2006 Dampak Alih Guna Hutan Menjadi Agroforestry Kopi Terhadap Tingkat Nitrifikasi : Inventori populasi dan aktivitas bakteri nitrifikasi. AGRIVITA 28(3): 267-268
Richard D, Bardgett, R. Cook. 1998. Functional aspects of soil animal diversity in agricultural grass lands, Applied Soil Ecology, Manchester M13
Ruiz N and Lavelle P. 2008. Soil Macrofauna Field Manual Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
Ruthenberg H.1980. Farming Systems in the Tropics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 424 pp.
Sagita L., Siswanto B., Hairiah K. 2014. Studi keanekaragaman dan kerapatan nematoda pada Berbagai sistem penggunaan lahan di sub das Konto, Jurnal Tanah dan Sumberdaya Lahan Vol. I No. 1 : 53 – 63, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Sardjono M A.,Djogo T., Arifin H. S., dan Wijayanto N. 2003. Klasifikasi dan Pola Kombinasi Komponen Agroforestri. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Bogor
Schroth G, Krauss U, Gasparotto L, Aguilar A, and Vohland K. 2000.Pest and diseases in agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Agroforestry Systems, 50:
Seastedt T. R. 1984. Therole of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29,25±46.
Setyaningsih H., Hairiah K., dan Dewi W. S.Respon Cacing Penggali Tanah Ponthoscolex Corethrurus Terhadap Berbagai Kualitas Seresah, Jurnal Tanah dan Dumberdaya Lahan Vol. 1 No. 2 : 58 – 69, 2014
Setiawan Y. Sugiyarto, Wiryanto. 2003.Relationship of soil macrofauna and mesofauna populations with content of C, N, polyphenols, and ratio of C/N and polyphenols/N plant organic matter, Biosmart Vol. 5 No. 2 : 134-137
Sihombing, D. T. H. 2002. Satwa Harapan I. Pengantar Ilmu dan Teknologi Budidaya Pustaka Wirausaha Muda. Bogor.
Stephenson, J. 1923. The Fauna of British India Including Ceylon and BurmaOligochaeta. Taylor and Francis, Red Lion Court, Fleet Street. London.
Subowo, G. 2011. Peran cacing tanah kelompok endogaesis dalam meningkatkan efisiensi pengolahan Tanah lahan kering.Balai penelitian tanah. Bogor
Suntoro. 2002. Prediksi pengaruh aktivitas asam organik hasil dekomposisi berbagai sumber bahan organik terhadap Fe, Al dan ketersediaan P dioxic dystrudept.Jurnal Sains Tanah 1 (2): 11-14.
Suprayogo D., K. Hairiah, Nuraini W., Sunaryo, Van. Noordwijk, 2003. Peran Agroforestry pada Skala Plot : Analisi Komponen Agroforestry Sebagai Kunci Keberhasilan atau Kegagalan Pemanfaatan Lahan. ICRAF. Bogor
Suprayogo. D., Widianto, Purnomosidi P., Widodo R. H., Rusiana F., Aini Z. Z., Khasanah N., dan Kusuma Z. 2001. Degradasi sifat fisik tanah sebagai akibat alih guna lahanHutan menjadi sistem kopi monokultur : Kajian perubahan makroporositas tanah, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
Swibawa, I.G dan Aeny, T.N. 1999. Nematoda Parasit Tumbuhan pada Perkebunan Pisang di Lampung. Jurnal Pengembangan Wilayah Lahan Kering No.24 : 21-27.
Tian, G. 1992. Biological Effects of Plant Residues with Contrasting Chemical Compositions on Plant and Soil under Humid Tropical Conditions. PhD Thesis.Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.
Tian, G. Olimah J. A., Adeoye G. O., and Kang B.T. 2000. Regeneration of Earthworm Populations in a Degraded Soil by Natural and Planted Fallows under Humid Tropical Conditions Published in Soil Sci. Soc. Nigeria. Am. J. 64:222±228
Undang – undang Republik Indonesia 1999. Nomor 41 Tentang Kehutanan. Jakarta.
Van Noordwijk, M., and Swift, M.J. 1999.Belowground Biodiversity and Sustainability of Complex Agroecosystems. In: A Gafur, FX Susilo, M. Utomo and M van Noordwijk (Eds.). Proceedings of a Workshop on Management of Agrobiodiversity in Indonesia for Sustainable Land Use and Global Environmental Benefits.UNILA/PUSLIBANGTAN, Bogor, 19-20 Agust 1999.ISBN 979-8287-25-8.p 8-28
Van. Noordwijk dan Hairiah K. 2006. Intensifikasi Pertanian, Biodiversitas Tanah dan Fungsi Agro – Ekosistem, Agrivita Volume 28 No. 3, Malang
Van Noordwijk, Quan Nguyen, Minh Ha Hoang, Ingrid Öborn. 2013. Multipurpose agroforestry as a climate change resiliency option for farmers: an example of local adaptation in Vietnam. 117:241–257.
Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Klironomos, J. N., Setela, H., van der Putten, W.H. And Hail, D.H., 2004. Ekological Linkages Between Aboveground and Belowground Biota.SCIENCE Vol.304.pp. 1629-1633
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program. 148 p. ICRAF, Accountability and local level to reduce emission from deforestation and degradation in Indonesia. ALREDDI final report. Bogor, Indonesia: World Agroforestry
Centre (ICRAF) Southeast Asia Regional Program. 114 p. IPCC, Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability.
Wibowo. S. 2015Hubungan cacing Tanah dengan Kondisi Fisik, Kimia dan Mikrobiologis Tanah Masam Ultisol di Daerah Lampung Utara.Agri peat, vol 6.No. 1. 45 – 55
Widianto, Hairiah K, D. Suprayogo, M. A. Sardjono. 2003. Peran dan Fungsi Agroforestri, World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Bogor.
Widianto, Suprayogo D., Noveras H., Widodo R. H., Purnomosidhi P., Van.Noordwijk, 2004.Alih Guna Lahan Hutan Menjadi Lahan Pertanian; Apakah Fungsi Hidrologis Hutan dapat digantikan sistem kopi monokultur ?AGRIVITA 26 (1) ;52 - 57
Widiastuti S. dan Sajidan, 2015. Kontribusi Naungan Pohon terhadap Kepadatan Cacing Tanah, Bioedukasi, Volume 7, nomor 2, Halaman 43 – 46
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2020-07-22 (3)
- 2020-07-20 (2)
- 2019-11-26 (1)