LEARNING FROM THE PRESENT AND THE PAST: A CONTEMPORARY AND HISTORICAL REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL IMPACTS ON SOIL FERTILITY

Authors

  • Leslie Campbell Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, University of Toronto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37478/agr.v4i1.465

Abstract

Conventional farming involves the use of synthetic and chemical pesticides that increases the short-term productivity of the soil with the expense of its long-term fertility. The emergence of alternative agriculture movement is estimated to have become a progressive response in increasing awareness of the long adverse effects on an effort to promote the soil which is well cultivated by the agro-ecological environment. Although it is a shift from conventional farming, alternative farming practices have not been adequately integrated as organic farming techniques and remain non-organic farming options. In an effort to explore the differences, we conducted a literature review of temperate areas studies comparing to conventional and alternative farming techniques in terms of their effects on soil nutrient levels. This review was found that 70% of the literature supports the use of alternative techniques as the means of reducing the agriculture impact on fertility and health of the soil and highlights the need of further research on the topic of longitudinal studies primarily in the context of the ecology of temperate climate. To contextualize contemporary view with the developing popularity of the alternative conventional farming system, we also explored the literature about the impact of agriculture that expanded again from the 1920s. The historical study examined literature concerning long-term fertility soil in Canada Journal on scientific agriculture to capture general environment narration about alternative farming at that time. It was found that a segment of the pre-1950s literature viewed the farming practices sustainable time, citing the declining yields to support this claim. The latest increasing proved in alternative farming techniques in response to a growing awareness of the long-term effects of conventional farming can be contextualized in the context of history as well as the rise of a more traditional approach to farming.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Keywords:

conventional farming, organic farming

References

Bengtsson J, Ahnstrom J, Weibull A. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Ecoloy. 2005; 42: p. 261-269.

Duram LA, Larson KL. Agricultural research and alternative farmers' information needs. Professional Geographer. 2001; 53(1): p. 84-96

Evenson RE, Gollin D. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science. 2003; 300(5620): p. 758-762.

Fliebach A, Oberholzer H, Gunst L, Mader P. Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indicators after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2007; 118: p. 273-284.

Knorr D, Watkins TR, editors. In Alterations in food production. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1984

Kristiansen P. Overview of organic agriculture. In Kristiansen P, Taji A, Reganold J, editors. Organic agriculture: a global perspective. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing; 2006. p. 1-23.

Liebig MA, Doran JW. Impact of organic production practises on soil quality indicators. Journal of Environmental Quality. 1999; 28: p. 1601-1609.

Leonard TM, editor. Encyclopedia of the Developing World, Volume 1 New York: Routledge; 2006.

Merriam-Webster Inc. "alternative". In Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary. 11th ed.; 2003.

Murata T, Goh KM. Effects of cropping systems on soil organic matter in a pair of conventional and biodynamic mixed cropping farms in Canterbury, New Zealand. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 1997; 25: p. 372-381.

Oberson A, Fardeau JC, Besson JM, H S. Soil phosphorus dynamics in cropping syhstems managed according to the conventional and biological agricultural methods. Biology and fertility of soils. 1993; 16: p. 111-117.

United Nations (Rome). Food and Agriculture Association of the United Nations. [Online].; 1999 [cited 2010 March 4. Available from: HYPERLINK "http://www.fao.org/unfao.bodies.COAG/COAG15/X0075E.htm"http://www.fao.org/unfao.bodies.COAG/COAG15/X0075E.htm.

Sherow JE. The grasslands of the United States: an environmental history California: ABC-CLIO Inc; 2007

Reganold JP, Palmer AS, C LJ, Macgregor AN. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science. 1993; 260: p. 344-349.

Tong C, Xiao H, Tang G, Wang H, Huang T, Xia H, et al. Long term fertilizer effects on organic carbon and total nitrogen and coupling relationship sof C and N in paddy soils in sutropical China. Soil & Tillage Research. 2009; 106: p. 8-14.

Walsh B. Getting real about the high price of cheap food. TIME. 2009 August; 174(8).

Downloads

Published

2011-06-01 — Updated on 2020-07-22

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles